Columns
Luetkemeyer Column- Sequestration and Spending
Washington,
February 22, 2013
Tags:
Budget
The president and the Senate have had months to show how they plan to replace the devastating, across-the-board cuts in the president’s sequester with responsible spending and reforms. They have failed, and on March 1 the president’s $85 billion worth of sequester cuts that affect our national defense and domestic programs go into effect.
The president and the Senate have had months to show how they plan to replace the devastating, across-the-board cuts in the president’s sequester with responsible spending and reforms. They have failed, and on March 1 the president’s $85 billion worth of sequester cuts that affect our national defense and domestic programs go into effect. There is no doubt that the sequester was the president’s idea and I, along with my Republican colleagues in the House, have twice voted to replace sequestration in the last Congress, one six months ago and again eight weeks ago. But the Senate declined to bring our legislation up for a vote. It is my belief that the president’s sequester should be replaced with spending cuts and reforms that will start us on the path to balancing the budget in 10 years. Among these commonsense cuts include eliminating a “too big to fail” bailout fund in the 2010 Dodd-Frank law. The GOP bills consolidate 47 overlapping government programs across nine agencies and restrain the growth and spending by government bureaucracies. The House-passed bills would save billions by clamping down on millionaires receiving food stamps, ending over-payment of taxpayer-funded benefits, and more. |